With Lightroom for example, I had to increase sharpness and details to match the A7 III, whereas with Iridient Developer, they both look good from the start. To test the continuous autofocus performance, I used the cameras in two of my usual testing grounds. The Sony a7 III is an entry-level full-frame camera that goes well beyond the basics in features, with excellent image quality, 10fps subject tracking, and 4K video capture. Sonys have always had an obtuse menu interface that requires us to look everywhere to find anything. Simple things like for example going from manual to auto ISO are very easy to do (hold down the button and use either the front or rear dial). The Z6 is precise and reliable. Thank you! But it would be a mistake to underestimate the Nikon Z6 because it has much to offer. They both use an OLED panel that is 0.5in wide and has a refresh rate of 60Hz. The camera performs well with adapted lenses and the only thing I’ve noticed is that when the frame is completely out of focus and the camera needs to shorten the focus distance, it can be quite slow to react. The Nikon has various level of compression for the RAW files. Focus sensitivity can be tweaked in the camera’s menu with a setting called Focus Tracking with Lock-On on the Z6 and AF Track Sens on the A7 III. Design and functionality4. with a few seperations. Blue tends a bit towards magenta on the Sony. The Panasonic Lumix DC-S5 and the Sony Alpha A7 III are two enthusiast cameras that were announced, respectively, in September 2020 and February 2018. They feel robust and well built. Both cameras do a good job of detecting the face, even if the subject turns 90˚ or is covered momentarily. The two cameras are closely matched and each can produce pro-quality stills and video content. While neither body is as big or as heavy as comparable full-frame DSLRs, you still get two relatively hefty cameras. In this review, we will be comparing Z6 and A7 III, two Pro Mirrorless cameras from Nikon and Sony. Or, spending $2600 gets one * Canon R6 with no lens and a benjamin in the pocket, or * Nikon z6ii with 24-70 f/4S zoom. Screen This tab shows the measurement values and graph derived directly from a RAW image when displayed on a computer screen at 100% magnification (i.e., one image pixel corresponding to one screen pixel). Personally, I’ve worked with single slot cameras for years and have never had a problem, so having just one card in the Z6 didn’t fill me with anxiety. Hopefully, in the end, we will be able to help you make the better decision between the Sony Alpha a5100 vs Nikon D5300 for your personal needs. Video is another key selling point for Sony mirrorless cameras, with the A7 III offering 4K at 30p, as well as full HD 1080/120p capture for super slow motion effect in post-production. Although both the Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III have a $2000 price tag, there are some important feature differences between them, too. They may look identical, but our Nikon Z6 II vs Z7 II head-to-head will help you pick which one of Nikon's latest full-frame mirrorless cameras is right for you. When we look at the available lenses for these two cameras, we see that Sony A7 III has an advantage over Nikon Z6 There are 126 lenses for Sony A7 III's Sony E mount, on the other hand there are only 18 lenses for Nikon Z6's Nikon Z lens mount. With the JPGs, it is Sony that displays more vivid reds but it also loses some texture and shades in the process. Furthermore the camera uses the XQD format which is more expensive than the SD type. They are both 24mp cameras and they are both priced at $2000. Some Sony primes and zooms have customisable button on the barrel, whereas each Z lens has a control ring that can be used for aperture, ISO, manual focus or exposure compensation. Early in 2016, I made the decision to switch from Nikon, which I had been shooting with for 9 years, to Sony. Technically Sony is a generation ahead of Nikon or Canon, but when you actually shoot with these cameras you immediately realize that the Canon or Nikon are what you really want. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Here is a brief description of what we like about them. Why I SWITCHED to the Nikon Z6 From the Sony A7III! Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison. So how do they compare? A7 III, 1/500, f/5.6, ISO 100 – FE 100-400mm GM. The E-mount system has grown a lot over the past few years thanks in part to its vast selection of native lenses, and the camera itself has many advantages. The Nikon includes the FTZ adapter in the box and since there aren’t a lot of native Z-mount lenses available yet, I had to use Nikkor and even Sigma lenses to complete my tests. Then we have face and eye detection. Eye AF on the A7 III performs really well. Sony has most recently released the Sony A7III and the A7RIII, the third generation of their full frame line, as well as the Sony A9, which is their flagship camera that rules above all (in most cases). The Sony and its 4D Tracking technology glue the points onto the subject and while it’s not perfect, it is reliable enough that you can set a large area such as Zone and not worry about the camera losing track of the player. In continuous AF, the performance on the Nikon is slower. They both work in 5 steps to make the autofocus more or less reactive. The A7 III is less expensive. The brand implemented the time-lapse feature via firmware update so hopefully more stuff will come in the future. The MIRRORLESS WARS BEGIN! Nikon is working hard to bring out as many lenses as possible for the Z mount. The Z6 comes with 5 function buttons, with two of them being at the front near the mount. The two cameras can shoot as fast as 1/8000s, or as slow as 30s before the Bulb mode. It is a paid upgrade and requires the camera to be sent to a Nikon Service Centre. The A7 III works with 14-bit uncompressed or compressed files. Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon Z6 and Sony A7 III compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you. I even managed two sharp shots at 1.6s with the Nikon. Nikon on the other hand surprised me with the Z7, and the Z6 performance is very close. The Nikon Z6 is technically heavier, at 675 g (1.5 lbs), but the Sony a7 III is hot on its heels (650 g/1.4 lbs), and the difference is small enough that you probably won’t notice when in the field. In this review, we will be comparing A7 III and Z6, two Pro Mirrorless cameras from Sony and Nikon. The day that Sony comes out with a better design will be the day that there won’t be much left to criticise about the A7 series at all. You won’t find a built-in flash on either camera and no unit is provided in the box. The autofocus in low light is a bit faster, Eye AF is quicker at detecting the subject right away, the buffer capabilities are greater and the battery lasts for longer. The Large Wide Area is the best choice, whereas Auto-Area with Tracking is too erratic and can’t be trusted. I prefer to change Sharpening and Mid-Sharpening manually but it remains difficult to reach the same quality seen on the Sony. Both cameras behave in the same way with auto while balance in a mixed scene of shades and light. The Z6 on the other hand is well configured by default. One drawback is the EVF which I find O.K. The A7 III doesn’t offer the option to prioritise the left or right eye, although this possibility exists on other models like the A6400 and A9.